Re: [PATCH] arm: at91: fix build-error for board-dt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 13:39 Sun 22 Apr     , Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 22 April 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 18:39 Sat 21 Apr     , Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Saturday 21 April 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > > Ok, we can discard this patch and see it as a bug report.
> > > > > Since you know best what you'd like, would you send a patch?
> > > > I'll fix on 3.5 by make it depends on AT91SAM9
> > > 
> > > I think it should be fixed for v3.4, especially since it's so easy
> > > to trigger and the fix will be trivial.
> > The symbol does not exist before
> > 
> > and the board-dt is sam9 only
> 
> How about this patch for v3.4 then? It ensures that we don't try to build
> ARCH_AT91RM9200 or ARCH_AT91X40 with MACH_AT91SAM_DT, which would be broken
> in v3.4-rc4 as Wolfram pointed out.
no I don't like it either

I prefer to apply this patch from 3.5
1441bd325bbbcd38d190b2444481b23cdf70069a ARM: at91: add SOC_AT91SAM9 kconfig
option to factorise select

and then fix it

so the board will be build only for sam9

Best Regards,
J.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter