Re: [PATCH] arm: davinci: pdctl next bit position incorrect

[Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello.

On 04/19/2012 08:52 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:

> > > > The PDCTL NEXT bit is incorrectly set to bit 1 instead of bit 0. This
> > > > patch fixes this issue

> > > > Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@xxxxxx>

> > > Applying this for v3.5.

> >     But why not to 3.4? It concerns turning on DSP domain on DM644x.

> Yes, but I think as you noted sometime before, no one is really
> depending on kernel to turn on DSP domain on DM644x.

   Looks like you're right (though I don't remember noting it :-).

> Its probably being
> done from U-Boot or ROM code. This is not a v3.4 regression either.

   U-Boot does it only when DSPLINK support is not desired.

> Thanks,
> Sekhar

WBR, Sergei

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel