Re: [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> SPEAr now supports common clock framework. This patchset contains changes
>> related to this. It also contain few dependency commits for clock framework that
>> are earlier sent separately.
>> @Mike: It would be easiest to get these through ARM-SoC tree. So, would need
>> your Acked-by on these patches. But firstly they must get reivewed :)
> We should agree on how we want to do the common clk patches for v3.5.
> The two options I see are either we take all the patches that Mike
> Acks into arm-soc, or Mike applies the patches in his own tree and
> submits them to arm-soc. I think either way is fine for me, but
> some people might feel strongly one way or another.

I would prefer the latter (I maintain a branch and submit it).  Is
arm-soc still the right place for common clk patches in 3.5 and
beyond?  I don't mind hosting a branch for inclusion into linux-next
and sending a pull request to Linus.  There is nothing ARM-specific
about the common framework.


linux-arm-kernel mailing list

[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter