Re: [PATCH 6/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500 variants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 09 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> Should we use max-frequency or clock-frequency for sdhci though? It looks
> like this is both the maximum frequency that it can use and the base frequency
> that the actual clock rate is derived from (can be a fraction).

This is ultimately setting the "f_max" ("maximum operating frequency")
field in the MMC core, so I'm happy naming the property "max-frequency".

It's true that this doesn't explain the derivation to clock rate --
but we weren't doing that before the DT binding either, and I think that
having a discrepancy between the DT property and the core's naming would
lead to confusion/mistakes.

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter