|
|
Re: [PATCH v5 06/27] irq_domain/powerpc: eliminate irq_map; use irq_alloc_desc() instead |
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 23:52 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > If we want to fix it a better way, then sure, that'll be good. But > what > we shouldn't do is re-introduce one regression to fix a different > regression. > > So, Thomas, what do you think about providing a way that a disabled > interrupt could have its pending status cleared such that when it's > enabled, any queued events are ignored? Maybe an > enable_and_clear_irq() ? Ok. Doesn't matter anyway, this shouldn't be the problem in this specific case. IE. we shouldn't be setting that interrupt to NONE. We should have parsed the device-tree and set the trigger appropriately. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |