Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux300: Fix unimplementable regulation constraints

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It doesn't make sense to grant permission to change the status of a
> regulator that is also set as always on and similarly it doesn't make
> sense to allow a driver to change the voltage of a regulator which can
> only be set to a single voltage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Most probably correct.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Do you want me to funnel this to ARM-SoC or will you carry it in the
regulator tree?

Thanks,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel