Re: [PATCH] of: Add generic device tree DMA helpers

[Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 03/19/2012 09:45 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2012, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> Maybe one can use named properties in a new device node in that case,
>>> like this:
>>>
>>>       bus {
>>>               dma: dma-controller {
>>>                       #dma-cells = <1>;
>>>               };
>>>
>>>               device {
>>>                       compatible = "device";
>>>                       channel: dma-channel {
>>>                               type = <0x1>;
>>>                               name = "foo";
>>>                               number = <23>;
>>>                               direction = <3>;
>>>                       };
>>>                       dma-requests = <&dma &channel>;
>>>               };
>>>       };
>>
>> For reference, this is very similar to how the pinctrl bindings work,
>> except that they require the "channel" node to be a child of the DMA
>> controller, and hence "dma-requests" doesn't contain <&dma &channel>,
>> just <&channel>, since "dma" is the parent (or grand-parent) of "channel".
> 
> Right, but the difference beytween the pinctrl binding and what I
> describe here is that the channel description would be part of the
> dma engine driver specific binding, not the generic binding that
> is visible to device drivers.

That's actually true for pinctrl as well: Common pinctrl bindings cover
the content/format of "dma-requests" and a requirement for a
"dma-channel" node, whereas the per-pin-controller bindings define the
content of node "dma-channel".

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel