Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] clk: introduce the common clock framework

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> Assuming that some day OMAP code can be refactored to allow for lazy
> (or at least initcall-based) registration of clocks then perhaps your
> suggestion can take root.  Which leads me to this question: are there
> any other platforms out there that require the level of expose to
> struct clk present in this patchset?  OMAP does, for now, but if that
> changes then I need to know if others require this as well.

I can't see the problem, really. Other than existing code doing stuff
before the memory allocator is up and running.

We allocate interrupt data structures in the early boot process today
and I don't see a reason why you want clocks, which have not been
configured by the boot loader, accesible before that point.

Thanks,

	tglx

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel