Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: core support for SMPS regulators for v3.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

* Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> [120308 09:37]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > * Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> [120307 11:42]:
> >> Tony,
> >> 
> >> Please pull the following support for using regulators to control the
> >> on-chip VC/VP managed voltage domains.
> >> 
> >> The regulator driver support for this is already queued in the regulator
> >> tree, and this is the supporting core work.
> >> 
> >> This combined with the CPUfreq changes to use the regulator framework
> >> will finally result in MPU DVFS working in mainline.
> >
> > Nice.. However this one might be missing some header changes?
> Oh, that's because it depends on the regulator core changes that are in
> Mark's regulator tree.  You need the for-next branch of :
> git:// 
> For this to compile correctly.
> Sorry, I should've been more clear above about the build dependency.

Hmm just checking.. Recently Mark replied to Peter:

* Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [120228 02:17]:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:40:10AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > NOTE: this series has been generated agains Takashi's topic/asoc branch merged
> > with Mark's for-next branch since this series depends on changes in Marks'
> > branch, but not yet pulled by Takashi (snd_soc_add_dai_controls implementation
> > from Liam).
> Never base *anything* off my for-next branch, it gets rebuilt regularly.

So can you guys please confirm that if is indeed an immutable
commit to use as a base to merge in something?



linux-arm-kernel mailing list

[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter