Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Hi Mark, On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff - I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
The issue is that the initial TWL regulator series from Rajendra will depend on the twl core DT support I have that depends on the irq_domain series from Grant...
So I guess, it will be easy for us to split the regulator patches from the DTS ones to have at least the driver changes merged by you. Then Tony might be able to pull all the DTS in one series and thus avoid the various merge conflict that will happen since most OMAP drivers are hacking the same DTS files.
Does that make sense? Or do you think it will be even worst separating the patches?
Thanks, Benoit _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]