Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:41:12 +0000
In-reply-to: <4F4B7798.6000300@ti.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.

Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
- I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
  - From: Cousson, Benoit

References:
- [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
  - From: Rajendra Nayak
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
  - From: Peter Ujfalusi
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
  - From: Rajendra Nayak

Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] i.MX fixes
Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] i.MX driver patches
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]

Add to Google

Follow linuxarm on Twitter