Re: [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shawn Guo wrote:
> Yes, I did something wrong.  But my point is the following patches
> should belong to one big series.  They can not be applied separately.
>
> [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ
> [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: imx: move SND_SOC_AC97_BUS selection down to machine driver
> [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: imx: initialize dma_params burstsize just in imx-ssi
> [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: imx: separate imx-pcm bits from imx-ssi driver
> [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: merge imx into fsl
> [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl

That's not what Mark is talking about.  You somehow posted patch 0/6 as a 
reply to the *previous* patchset, so the two patchsets were merged into 
one email thread.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter