Re: LPC32xx status (Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 24/01/12 20:25, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Expect the first one of the drivers to be submitted soon, I will
>> do them one by one.
> 
> I think the first step should be adding a generic defconfig and
> make sure this builds and boots (I think I have a phy3250
> somewhere, so I could test). After that new drivers would make
> sense. IIRC clock.c was pretty broken, we needed hacks to get USB
> working with a 2.6.35. I also see that your tree modifies it.

I see that you are already at it ;-) - for the others: On the server
"git.antcom.de", I meant repository "linux-2.6.git", branch "work92105".

Unfortunately, I currently don't have a phy3250, but can check
tomorrow with colleagues.

I guess the work92105_defconfig is only useful once the drivers
currently missing in mainline are merged. Or is there an arm specific
tree I should update from?

Thanks in advance!

Roland

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


[Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [PDAs]     [Linux]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Photos]

Add to Google Follow linuxarm on Twitter