|
|
Re: [RFC] ARM: at91: gpio add mux check |
On 10:39 Tue 25 Oct , Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > one of the the issue is what happened it the bootloader miss > > configured a pin a periph A or B? > > > > do we need to keep the tracking of it in the pinmux? > > Is there an AT91 pinmux driver? If yes, I guess it's something custom and I > have only looked briefly at these. Generally I would recommend modeling > any muxing using the pinctrl subsystem but if and only if Torvalds decide to > pull it in. Yes I start to implement one but I've need to hardcode in the driver the pull, multidrive per function I'll send it soon Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
[Linux ARM (vger)] [Linux ARM MSM] [Linux Omap] [Linux Arm] [Linux Tegra] [Fedora ARM] [eCos] [Linux Fastboot] [Gcc Help] [Git] [DCCP] [IETF Announce] [Security] [PDAs] [Linux] [Linux MIPS] [Yosemite Campsites] [Photos]
![]() |
![]() |