Re: kmap_atomic() oopses in current mainline

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:28:56 +0400 Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:33:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> > I don't think the 2-year-old Vaio has offload engine support ;) Dan, this:
> > 
> > +		if (flags & ASYNC_TX_KMAP_DST)
> > +			dest_buf = kmap_atomic(dest, KM_USER0) + dest_offset;
> > +		else
> > +			dest_buf = page_address(dest) + dest_offset;
> > +
> > +		if (flags & ASYNC_TX_KMAP_SRC)
> > +			src_buf = kmap_atomic(src, KM_USER0) + src_offset;
> > +		else
> > +			src_buf = page_address(src) + src_offset;
> > +
> > +		memcpy(dest_buf, src_buf, len);
> > +
> > +		if (flags & ASYNC_TX_KMAP_DST)
> > +			kunmap_atomic(dest_buf, KM_USER0);
> > +
> > +		if (flags & ASYNC_TX_KMAP_SRC)
> > +			kunmap_atomic(src_buf, KM_USER0);
> > +
> > 
> > is very wrong if both ASYNC_TX_KMAP_DST and ASYNC_TX_KMAP_SRC can ever be
> > set.  We'll end up using the same kmap slot for both src add dest and we
> > get either corrupted data or a BUG.
> 
> So far it can not since the only user is raid code, which only allows to
> perform either reading from bio or writing into one, which requires only
> one mapping.

hm, so we got lucky?

> Btw, shouldn't it always be kmap_atomic() even if flag is not set.
> That pages are usual one returned by alloc_page().

The code would work OK if the kmap_atomic()s were unconditional, but it
would be a bit more expensive if the page is in highmem and we don't
actually intend to access it with the CPU.

kmap_atomic() against a non-highmem page is basically free: just an
additional test_bit().
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel-announce" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html