Re: AM2, X2, Opteron, or Opteron Socket F?

["Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 09:53 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> actually afaik the alu has some tricks doing even "half clock" stuff
> (which then gets used by HT) so it's not as black and white as you make
> it out to be

Yes.  But it's not a full redesign either.  They made a few tricks that
were basically required to keep the simple pipe extensions from really
being inefficient.

E.g., HyperMarketing--er, HyperThreading is basically a NetBurst-only
hack because of that inefficiency and the availability of so many unused
stages.

> do you mean me? I happen to have a semiconductor design background ;)

Good.  Then don't play games on my words.

> yes there is. But all other high speed IO (I don't count floppy's or USB
> as such) is also 64 bit capable, at least if it's made in the last
> decade or so. 

But most people expect to be able to use all sorts of 32-bit devices
without knowing it.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith          Professional, technical annoyance
mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx    http://thebs413.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------------------
The world is in need of solutions.  Unfortunately, people
seem to be more interested in blindly aligning themselves
with one of only two viewponts -- an "us v. them" debate
that has nothing to do with finding an actual solution.


-- 
amd64-list mailing list
amd64-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list