Re: AM2, X2, Opteron, or Opteron Socket F? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:08 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > eh that's so not the case ;) Can you expand upon that? The NetBurst architecture had ALU and FPUs that were much slower per MHz than the PPro-P3. Slapping on SSE pipes is _not_ redesigning the FPU. > what does a "true interconnect" buy you in the <= 4 CPU case? > Or an IOMMU if all your moderate and high bandwidth IO is 64 bit > capable? Can you guarantee all your I/O is? -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs413.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------- The world is in need of solutions. Unfortunately, people seem to be more interested in blindly aligning themselves with one of only two viewponts -- an "us v. them" debate that has nothing to do with finding an actual solution. -- amd64-list mailing list amd64-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list
[Search] [Home] [Kernel List] [Linux ia64] [Linux X86_64] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Migration] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Red Hat 9 Mailing List] [Fedora Legacy] [Yosemite News]