Re: Kernel source | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 06:22 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > there is nothing illegal about binary applications. > However binary kernel modules link to the kernel and are a derived work > of the kernel (for many reasons) and thus need to be GPL licensed (as > per the GPL license). For example, basically every binary module > contains code taken from the GPL kernel. Actually, Linus has clarified his position on many items. For example, the NDIS Wrapper links in a non-GPL binary object. But because that binary object was not written for Linux, it is not incompatible with the GPL. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs413.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------ ****** Speed doesn't kill. Difference in speed does! ****** -- amd64-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list
[Search] [Home] [Kernel List] [Linux ia64] [Linux X86_64] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Migration] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Red Hat 9 Mailing List] [Fedora Legacy] [Yosemite News]