|
|
|
Re: Opteron Vs. Athlon X2 | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
> The differences between 939 pin opterons and amd64's are from what > I can tell only clock speed and cache. there are some which apparently have the same pinout, clock, cache. I didn't check to see whether they have the same rev, though (sse3?) > S939 opterons and S939 amd64's use non-registered memory. They support > ECC, but many motherboards seem not to support it. On the ones I've > checked the manual nor bios mentioned ECC. Additionally in other manuals > I've seen that ECC "works" but doesn't provide ECC functionality. the tyan S2866 appears to be a fairly normal s939 which http://www.tyan.com/products/html/tomcatk8esli.html the manual definitely presents ECC options and even shows 'enabled' as the reccomended/default. this board looks pretty nice - anyone have experience with it? the S2866G3NR model even has integrated video, and avoids the 3-stack of audio connectors that prevent some boards fitting 1U. even has IPMI support, though some people might shed a tears about multiple nics on a 32x33 PCI and on weekends, you can use NV SLI on it ;) actually, now that I look, the supermicro H8SSL-i also definitely supports ECC (and might have a slightly nicer LAN config.) for sheer obsessive completeness, I also checked the manual for the asus a8n5x - unquestionably a desktop-oriented board. it also appears to have a working ECC config option, though it defaults off. regards, mark hahn. -- amd64-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list
[Search] [Home] [Kernel List] [Linux ia64] [Linux X86_64] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Migration] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Red Hat 9 Mailing List] [Fedora Legacy] [Yosemite News]