|
|
|
Re: generating 32-bit RPM's | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Joshua Jensen <joshua@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:52:20AM -0500, Jonathan Berry wrote: >> >> I don't know about the "almost no RPMs do." Almost all RPMs are built >> for multiple architectures. > > You don't need multiple %ifarch statements to build a package for both > arches... so long as you are building them *natively on those > platforms*. You need nothing special to get gcc to assume 64bits on a > 64 bit platform. You need lots of special considerations though to > recompile for a platform that *isn't* native. I've worked with a ton of > packages (even recompiled every single RPM in RHEL3), and besides > openssl, the kernel, and the glibc packages, there is nothing there to > support --target. > >> > have to have a *cross compiler* installed on your x86_64 platform. I >> > don't know that -m32 does all that you need. >> >> But, 32-bit and 64-bit are both x86. It's not like he's trying to >> compile for SPARC or PowerPC here, which *would* need a >> cross-compiler. See below. > > No they aren't. A 32 bit binary is very very different than a 64bit > one. Sure, the machine code from IA32 looks more similar to x86-64 code > than say 64bit PPC, but it isn't the same and they should be considered > completely seperate archs. [ Sorry for the late reply. I was off camping for a few days. -wsr ] I see now I wasn't very clear in my question. Sorry about that. I am writing my own simple helloworld.spcc file and trying to build a helloworld-0.1-1.i386.rpm and helloworld-0.1-1.x86_64.rpm RPM for both architectures while running on a machine with x86_64 installed. I was hoping that "rpmbuild --target i386" would take care of all the "behind the scenes" work of throwing the right compiler and linker switches and modifying whatever else needed a bit of tweaking. I am getting the impression that it isn't that simple and I need to throw all those switches myself from inside the *.spec file. I guess I need to look at openssl and glibc to see what they do. Is there a better rpm spec file to use as a model? -wolfgang -- Wolfgang S. Rupprecht http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/ -- amd64-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list
[Search] [Home] [Kernel List] [Linux ia64] [Linux X86_64] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Migration] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Red Hat 9 Mailing List] [Fedora Legacy] [Yosemite News]