Re: More info Re: dual head radeon -- again | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 hansel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Experimental support for radeon, indeed! Nevertheless I have some progress >and predictable error messages. The config file is attached in its >entirety. Some failed experiments are commented out (visible warts). > >I think the most significant error, if accurate is the failure to setup >the address space on the card. > >-- X server captured output > --snip-- > (WW) RADEON(0): Failed to set up write-combining range (0xf0000000,0x2000000) > (WW) RADEON(1): Failed to set up write-combining range (0xf2000000,0x2000000) > --snip-- No, the above are Warning messages, indicating that X was unable to set up MTRRs on your CPU. This means either: - Your kernel does not have MTRR support compiled in or available or - The kernel MTRR support does not support your specific hardware or - The kernel has blacklisted your hardware due to known bugs in the MTRR implementation (ie: some serverworks chipsets like OSB4) or - All MTRRs are already set, or a conflicting MTRR is set. /proc/mtrr lists the MTRRs or - The MTRR code mishandles a particular MTRR implementation. Note that this is /only/ a performance thing. When X is able to use MTRR support, there is a performance gain anywhere up to 2.5 times. Lack of working MTRRs only reduces performance, it does not at all cause lockups/hangs/crashes or otherwise affect stability, and does not cause any other type of problems. You can think of MTRR support as being "turbo video". -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat -- amd64-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list
[Search] [Home] [Kernel List] [Linux ia64] [Linux X86_64] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Migration] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Red Hat 9 Mailing List] [Fedora Legacy] [Yosemite News]