Re: Nvidia drivers + gingin

[Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 17:43, Chris Chuter wrote:
> Matt, thanks for the pointers. It appears that the linux source included with
> gingin64 is missing the define tag for non-smp systems (in version.h in the
> linux source dirs).
> 
> Is gingin64 not ready for single cpu AMD64 systems?
> 
> If I add the define (e.g. ifndef UTS_RELEASE, define UTS_RELEASE "2.4.20-9.2")
> to the source in the Nvidia kernel drivers, things compile, but I get many
> unresolved symbols. So my guess is that gingin64 is missing a few modules
> needed for the nvidia kernel module. Would you concur, Matt?

we haven't tested the nvidia binary only kernel module nor do we know if
it's compatible with our kernel......
However I doubt the kernel-source rpm is defective; it's more likely to
be a mismatch between our kernels and the nvidia binary.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part