|
|
|
Re: autoconf/automake: handling the installation of desktop files / icons | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
I think you're going above and beyond the call of duty. ;-) However, IMO, it's impossible to account for all the various packaging schemes at the source distribution level. In the project I work with, the source tarball installs to "standard" directories under /usr/local. After that it is up to the package maintainer of a given distribution to customize the installation for their binary package management. Otherwise I think one will go insane or at least set themselves up for a lot of extra, thankless work trying to chase even the most popular packaging formats. YMMV, - Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
[GCC Help] [Kernel Discussion] [RPM Discussion] [Red Hat Development] [Yosemite News] [USB] [Samba]
![]() |
![]() |