|
|
|
Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 2 Mar 2012 at 17:10:17 -0700 in <4F516169.9010601@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Actually, this really is part of the reason - since xz is technically > superior to gzip (better compression, same decompression speeds), we are > doing users a favor by getting xz installed and commonly available in > more places. Generally speaking, if you think you are "doing a favor" by adding a requirement, most people will disagree with you. --jhawk@xxxxxxx John Hawkinson _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
[GCC Help] [Kernel Discussion] [RPM Discussion] [Red Hat Development] [Yosemite News] [USB] [Samba]
![]() |
![]() |