Re: Convensions for NO_<feature> instead of HAVE_<feature>?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
I have also used WANT_FEATURE and NEED_FEATURE sometimes. If the app sets WANT_FEATURE and configure says is it there already, we do not define NEED_FEATURE. If configure says it is not there, we define NEED_FEATURE and then in this case we provide the feature. H _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
[GCC Help] [Kernel Discussion] [RPM Discussion] [Red Hat Development] [Yosemite News] [USB] [Samba]