|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
The package worked in rpm, but not in yum. -----Original Message----- From: yum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:yum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Panu Matilainen Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 5:03 PM To: Yellowdog Updater, Modified Subject: Re: createrep question On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kidwell,jr, Jack wrote: > >> Seth, >> >> Thank you for patiently seeing this through. I'm the guy with the >> yum-unfriendly COTS RPM. The vendor saw the light and fixed their RPM, >> so it's yummy! > > glad to hear it - I'm still just a little bit curious how they were building > it before, though. Mmmh, a package without sourcerpm tag rings a certain jRPM bell in my head. OTOH rpm should notice its missing and fake it if it otherwise looks like a binary package, but how exactly all this works depends on rpm version. - Panu - _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]