|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kidwell,jr, Jack wrote:Seth, Thank you for patiently seeing this through. I'm the guy with the yum-unfriendly COTS RPM. The vendor saw the light and fixed their RPM, so it's yummy!glad to hear it - I'm still just a little bit curious how they were building it before, though.
Mmmh, a package without sourcerpm tag rings a certain jRPM bell in my head. OTOH rpm should notice its missing and fake it if it otherwise looks like a binary package, but how exactly all this works depends on rpm version.
- Panu - _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
