|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
I have no idea and the COTS vendor is "researching" it. Did I mention
that I dislike COTS?
-----Original Message-----
From: yum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:yum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Seth Vidal
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:39 AM
To: Yellowdog Updater, Modified
Subject: Re: createrep question
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Kidwell,jr, Jack wrote:
> I understand. Then let's approach this another way. Here's the patch
we
> made in createrepo/dumpMetadata.py:
>
> def arch(self):
> if self.tagByName('sourcepackage') == 1 or (
> not self.options['relaxed-sourcerpm-check'] and not
> self.tagByName('sourcerpm') ):
> return 'src'
> else:
> return self.tagByName('arch')
>
> Here's the original "if" expression:
>
> if self.tagByName('sourcepackage') == 1 or not
> self.tagByName('sourcerpm'):
>
> What risks are we taking by allowing binary RPMs to omit a sourcerpm
> tag? Can we assume that, for workaround purposes, the sourcepackage
tag
> was not adequate for detecting source RPMs and, hence, the additional
> test for a missing sourcerpm tag was required? I lack your broad
> exposure to RPMs, so I don't know how commonly this condition occurs.
Then please tell me how this rpm was created. Was it made using
rpmbuild?
-sv
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]