Re: multiple structs with the same name

[Michael Holzheu <holzheu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Dave,

On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:45:55 -0400 (EDT)
Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

> 
> So I suppose we *could* have a new crash "block" environment variable,
> settable with the "set" command, and then while it's in play you would
> see stuff based upon that particular scope.  Hmmm...
> 
> I just wonder if it's worth it given the parcity of actual examples of
> multiple structs with the same name.  That's why I'm wondering if
> anybody else on the list has run into this kind of problem?

If I remember correctly, I already had such a problem some time ago and
IMHO it would be very useful to have the possibility in crash to define
the current context.

Michael

--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility