Re: [PATCH] seccomp: ignore secure_computing return values

[Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:41 -0500 Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Unless an architecture selects CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER, it
>> is not required to respect the return value from secure_computing().
>>
>> This change matches https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/14 exactly except
>> that it applies cleanly to security-next.  Because there is no
>> other difference than the alignment, I've kept Signed-off-by intact.
>
> Given that, I think you should have kept the authorship (i.e. put
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

No problem - happy to resend!  I manually created the patch (grep; vi)
but and the result was identical :)

> at the top of the patch).  Also, you should probably mention the compile
> error that this fixes in the commit message as well.

I'll fix it and resend!

> But otherwise, thanks for submitting this.

Didn't mean to obscure authorship or the details.

Cheers!
will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html