[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] seccomp: ignore secure_computing return values

Hi Will,

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:41 -0500 Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Unless an architecture selects CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER, it
> is not required to respect the return value from secure_computing().
> This change matches https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/14 exactly except
> that it applies cleanly to security-next.  Because there is no
> other difference than the alignment, I've kept Signed-off-by intact.

Given that, I think you should have kept the authorship (i.e. put

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

at the top of the patch).  Also, you should probably mention the compile
error that this fixes in the commit message as well.

But otherwise, thanks for submitting this.

Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpBfN8mwZr9b.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux