Re: [PATCH] seccomp: ignore secure_computing return values

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Will,

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:41 -0500 Will Drewry <wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Unless an architecture selects CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER, it
> is not required to respect the return value from secure_computing().
> 
> This change matches https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/14 exactly except
> that it applies cleanly to security-next.  Because there is no
> other difference than the alignment, I've kept Signed-off-by intact.

Given that, I think you should have kept the authorship (i.e. put

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

at the top of the patch).  Also, you should probably mention the compile
error that this fixes in the commit message as well.

But otherwise, thanks for submitting this.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpBfN8mwZr9b.pgp
Description: PGP signature