[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [REVIEW][PATCH 0/43] Completing the user namespace

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrew Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Eric W. Biederman
>> <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sounds like you're reinventing (something very similar to)
>> no_new_privs.  Why not just require no_new_privs as a prerequisite for
>> creating a user namespace if you're unprivileged?
> As I said in the part of my email you snipped, because no_new_privs will
> break suid exec in the user namespace.
> I am most definitely not going to require something that will make
> implementing/using user namespaces almost pointless.

This part:

> Currently the suid exec will fail because the uid's don't map.
> I might switch that around to simply ignoring the change of uid
> on suid exec.  I have a patch in my devel tree that plays with
> that idea.  However as much as I hit that case once in testing
> (I think it was ping).  I don't think running suid executables
> is particularly interesting.

I'm totally lost now.  I'll wait until I play around with the patches some more.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux