Re: Junk on build scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Sijis Aviles <sijis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Elad <el.il@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Most build scripts (build.py) that I checked (I checked all except
>> fedorahosted) contains useless conditions, options, functions and
>> imports, which make it really hard for me to improve them.
>>
>> Only two build scripts were good, fp.o and fedoracommunity.org.
>> I checked what happens if I copy the fp.o build.py to start.fpo, and
>> it worked. So, my question is, wouldn't it be better if we do it for
>> all sites?
>> (also would you accept replacing start.fpo build.py with fp.o build.py?)
>>
>> --
>> -Elad.
>>
>
> Ideally all the build.py scripts should be identical. I can't think of any
> reason they would be different.
>
> There has also been a though to have a single build script that would build
> all the sites.
>
> Sijis
>
Well my parallel build patches removes that junk. It was trac related
and only relevant to fedorahosted. You might want to ignore this
message as it turns out my patches works and it's not complicated as I
thought it was.

-- 
-Elad.
-- 
websites mailing list
websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux