Re: Fail to start bacula director with systemctl. NOT SOLVED.

[Joe Zeff <joe@xxxxxxx>]

On 06/30/2012 01:33 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> Well, since it makes bacula run, it IS a solution allthough I admit it
> IS bad.

No it isn't.  It's a work-around that allows bacula to run while 
ignoring the central issue: you need to find out how to make bacula run 
correctly while running as user bacula.  If the program itself is owned 
by that user, you may be able to get things going by using the suid bit. 
 It's a tad weird, I know, and I'm not sure it's a Good Idea.  However, 
if user bacula only has normal privileges, it's *probably* safe.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org