Re: how to use a mailing-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 4/7/2012 6:03 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 07.04.2012 23:41, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
>> Fascinating as these headers are, lets look back at the headers
>> of the message Fernando replied to and you called him out for bad
>> etiquette:
>> To: Fedora List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To:
>> phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Community support for Fedora users
>> <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Do you acknowledge that those headers, when replying might cause
>> you to send your reply to three addresses?
> no
> this would only mean reply to "phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" and not 
> additionally to two other addressess
> but as MULTIPLE explained:
> is is in the responsible of the HUMAN who press "send" to verify
> that the RCPT is what he want and not act blindly
> what you also stil do not realize is that my topic change was not
> because ONE single message, it was caused by get way too much
> useless copies all over the time
>> This is you I presume: 
> yes
>> This is me:
> and now?
>> Given that one of us is a senior engineer for a rather large
>> managed hosting company and probably spends 50% of his time
>> dealing with mail issues for thousands of customers and the other
>> one is you, precisely what is your grounds for calling me
>> ignorant of mail issues? Actually don't answer that, I probably
>> don't care what you think as it will probably be a long message
>> about how I am wrong.
> who do you think you are?
> i try to prevent get personal now but let's said one thing
> my expierience in the last years is that as larger the copmany and
> as more titles a person has the real knowledge is directly the
> opposite
> so no, you can not impress me with any reference and the fact that 
> you stil do not understand why "reply all" is idiotic (to say it
> clear) shows that you are one more of the "big but failing"
> is it really so hard to understand that my intention was to educate
> people that "reply all" in context of mailing-lists is ALWAYS wrong
> and taht the fact that i get TWO messages twice from Fernando which
> was no direct reply to me was the reason to say "now it is
> enough"?
> if you still think "reply all" is the correct method to reply ona
> mailing-list please do not reply any more and leave me fuck in
> peace because you are a perfect example for "learning resistent"
> and i have really better things to do as explain such people again
> and again basics

Honest to goodness people!

There are some people that will never let the truth, the facts, or
reality interfere with what they have been told to believe.


users mailing list
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
Have a question? Ask away:

Photo 4 Less

[Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Find Someone Special]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

Add to Google Powered by Linux