Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> >I don't want to ship a desktop that doesn't let the user do useful
> >things.
> 
> And you can ship a desktop SPIN that way. But the base pkgs should
> not install with an insecure set of choices.
> 
> if you want the spin to have a post-scriptlet which allows more
> things, then that's the choice of the desktop sig over the desktop
> spin.

Given how .pkla works, this is likely to be done with packages, not
with %post hackery. (Which should make it much easier to reliably
test, as well.)

Bill

--
Fedora-security-list mailing list
Fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list

[Home]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Coolkey]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net