Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I don't want to ship a desktop that doesn't let the user do useful things.
And you can ship a desktop SPIN that way. But the base pkgs should not install with an insecure set of choices.
if you want the spin to have a post-scriptlet which allows more things, then that's the choice of the desktop sig over the desktop spin.
We should not be forcing the choices for the desktop spin on everyone who installs a pkg in the distribution.
-sv -- Fedora-security-list mailing list Fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list
[Home] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Coolkey] [Fedora Tools]