Re: Security testing: need for a security policy, and a security-critical package process

[Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote:

> I don't want to ship a desktop that doesn't let the user do useful
> things.

And you can ship a desktop SPIN that way. But the base pkgs should not 
install with an insecure set of choices.

if you want the spin to have a post-scriptlet which allows more things, 
then that's the choice of the desktop sig over the desktop spin.

We should not be forcing the choices for the desktop spin on everyone who 
installs a pkg in the distribution.

-sv

--
Fedora-security-list mailing list
Fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list