Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Security reviews for new packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


>>>>> "MT" == Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

MT> I guess I can "basic" reviews also required for other packages,
MT> however for security matters I really applicate any help from who
MT> knows how to deal with securitly issues.

Well, my request didn't result in any assistance, so I'm not terribly
optimistic about being able to do this more generally.  I'm just going
to review security-sensitive packages as well as I can and make a note
here when I'm doing it.  If one of these packages later turns up with
a major exploit and someone wants to flame me for not blocking on more
serious security review, I suppose they're welcome to pound sand.

 - J<

--
Fedora-security-list mailing list
Fedora-security-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-security-list

[Home]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Coolkey]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net