On 09.03.2011 19:08, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> As I suggested earlier, I'm strict against a catch-all robots-udevrules
>
> Happy to rename it to something narrower. Can you look at this list
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/11.2.0/Robotics_plan#Test_matrix and help me
> figure out how we can refine the name? These robots and boards have a
> few things in common:
>
> - they are usb (some bluetooth)
> - they have an education focus
>
> edurobots-udevrules?
That still is way to vague. I suggest creating a package per
robot/board/platform/sensor/actuator. If there is a canonical software
package for a particular robot, e.g. a library most commonly used to
access it, pack the rules in there (examples are libphidget or
libunicap). Arduinos are not even robot-specific, so it would be even
more terrible to stuff that into this package. There seems to be an
arduino package. Having a noarch arduino-udevrules sub-package seems to
be the most sensible, or at least a separate package of that name.
Please do not try to pocket all kinds of hardware into a single package
just because that's they way you use it in your context.
Tim
--
Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> www.niemueller.de
=================================================================
Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)
_______________________________________________
robotics mailing list
robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Electronics Lab]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[Yosemite Photos]
[KDE Users]
[Fedora Tools]