Re: Re: Naming Scheme php-pear-HTML_Javascript and php-pear-Auth_HTTP | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:24:26AM +0100, Tim Jackson wrote: > My opinions: > > 1. Current packages should follow the existing conventions. All current > packages bar two are php-pear-Foo-Bar. HTML_Javascript and Auth_HTTP > should fall into line. Let's be consistent. > > 2. Remi's suggestion to update the Guidelines to make this explicit is good. > > 3. If we were building a new distro from scratch tomorrow, with hindsight my > personal preference would be to use php-pear-Foo_Bar. > > 4. Notwithstanding (3), I cannot see *any* point whatsoever in undergoing a > massive exercise in revising the guidelines and renaming all existing > packages. I would certainly not expend any time on it myself. I agree with everything above. Regards, Joe _______________________________________________ Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list Fedora-php-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
