Re: Re: Naming Scheme php-pear-HTML_Javascript and php-pear-Auth_HTTP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:24:26AM +0100, Tim Jackson wrote:
> My opinions:
> 1. Current packages should follow the existing conventions. All current
>    packages bar two are php-pear-Foo-Bar. HTML_Javascript and Auth_HTTP
>    should fall into line. Let's be consistent.
> 2. Remi's suggestion to update the Guidelines to make this explicit is good.
> 3. If we were building a new distro from scratch tomorrow, with hindsight my
>    personal preference would be to use php-pear-Foo_Bar.
> 4. Notwithstanding (3), I cannot see *any* point whatsoever in undergoing a
>    massive exercise in revising the guidelines and renaming all existing
>    packages. I would certainly not expend any time on it myself.

I agree with everything above.

Regards, Joe

Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list

[Home]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux