Re: "cfg" role in /etc? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:33:13PM +0000, Tim Jackson wrote: > PEAR 1.7.0 introduced a new "cfg" role, analagous to our RPM "%config" > role. This was something I requested, since I always found it strange that > PEAR didn't have such a thing when we find it useful in RPM land, and PEAR > and RPM are comparable in their goals. > > Anyway, as it stands in rawhide, cfg_dir defaults to /usr/share/pear/cfg > but I think it really should be /etc/pear . (Then you would get config > files installed like so: /etc/pear/Some_Package/foo.ini) Seems reasonable, though /etc/pearkeys is used too, so maybe it would be better to do: cfg_dir => /etc/pear/conf sig_keydir => /etc/pear/keys What do you think? joe _______________________________________________ Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list Fedora-php-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
