Re: [Fwd: Re: Pear in EL-4]

[Jeff Sheltren <sheltren@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:42 AM, Remi Collet wrote:

> Don't understand why this list haven't a "reply-to" header like  
> other...
>
>
> -------- Message original --------
> Sujet: 	Re:  Pear in EL-4
> Date: 	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:43:15 -0500
> De: 	Brandon Holbrook <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Pour :: 	Remi Collet <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Références: 	<46907AF2.4020606@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <46912C1F.1060405@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
> <46927A52.5020307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> Joe, any comments on building a new php-pear for epel4 that would  
> allow
> us to include our existing pear packages?
>
> -Brandon

Hi Brandon, the problem is that EPEL has explicitly stated that it  
does not want to replace packages which are already part of RHEL.  See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ 
GuidelinesAndPolicies#head-5db8a0be339548ee7553b9360071ce7021e8535b

Remi, it may be better to bring this up on epel-devel-list and get a  
definite answer there.

And, yes, I would really love for this list to set a 'reply-to'  
header :)

-Jeff

_______________________________________________
Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-php-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list