Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml

["Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:53 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

>  - Clarify where documentation should go.  Currently my practice has
>    been to put just the license file (if any) in the main package's %doc,
>    and the license file plus all other documentation & examples in
>    the devel subpackage.  This duplicates (only) the license file, but
>    that seems acceptable since we shouldn't distribute software without
>    its license.

-devel packages should Require the main package, thus, there really
isn't any need for the duplicate license copy.

~spot