Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:05:58 +0000
Cc: fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080301170108.GA11487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20080301150548.GA10317@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080301153811.GA10706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080301170108.GA11487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Fedora OCaml list <fedora-ocaml-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 17:01 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> 
> And:
> 
>  - certain binaries should not be stripped
>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435559

That's a bad way to phrase the problem, surely? It's OCaml doing
something 'strange' which make stripping break, almost certainly -- we
should fix that instead.

-- 
dwmw2

Prev by Date: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
Next by Date: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
Previous by thread: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
Next by thread: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]