Re: Do we need an upgrade policy for OCaml packages in Fedora releases? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
2008/2/16, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>: > We've got requests such as this one (upgrade lablgtk to 2.10.0 in Fedora 8): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424821 > and a related one from Peter Lemenkov to support mldonkey. MLDonkey is a killerapp for OCaml. I think satisfying its requirements must be high priority task. I don't see many problems in rebuilding few applications with latest ocaml libraries. Let's create exact list of obstacles which prevents from updating ocaml for mldonkey because all I've heard so far are speculative estimates "that something will be wrong", OK there is something wrong right now - the latest version (with a couple of critical bugs closed) most popular ocaml application, e.g. mldonkey can't be built with currently shipped ocaml libraries w/o breaking its requirements. -- With best regards!
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy List] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]