Re: Special issue #140

["Oisin Feeley" <oisinfeeley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:59:24 +0530, "Rahul Sundaram"
<sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
> 
> > I would agree with removing the speculation and guesses, including
> > removing the Debian thing.  The DSA vs. RSA bit has some relevance as
> > Fedora Contributors are needing to re-upload their SSH keys to FAS and
> > DSA keys are no longer accepted to my knowledge.
> 
> Yes, however this happened sometime *before* the incident.

Great prompt feedback from everyone.  Please feel free to snip out
anything deemed non-useful. I'm afraid I'm out of the loop for a few
hours, so have at it.  I kind of agree with the comments arguing that
the current presentation may be muddying the waters a bit. My thinking
(while knowing nothing) was to try to get a rough historical context of
both how this incident progressed *publically* and also how other
projects have been compromised in the past. Perhaps not appropriate. So
please, slash away as desired.

Thanks to all for the rapid, smart responses
-- 
  Oisin Feeley
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OisinFeeley

_______________________________________________
Fedora-news-list mailing list
Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list