Re: keeping spare-time-contributors happy
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Julian Sikorski wrote:
Rahul Sundaram pisze:Hans de Goede wrote:And why not ? They worked well enough before, didn't they? Don't get me wrong I'm in favor of updates announcements and of avoiding unneeded updates.If you already in favor of these, I don't think you need any convincing that these are important for the end users. Sure, they aren't absolutely necessary but these are an improvement over what we had previously and there is some additional overhead as part of that. If anyone in favor of the processes then implementation details can be improved. If anyone thinks that the processes themselves are not useful then any implementation won't make them happy. Don't mix these. RahulThe other problem is that pup does not display the info maintainers put into bodhi yet.
So you mean that we are doing this whole dance for like .. nothing? Ah great planning guys. Regards, Hans -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]