Re: RFC: licensing issue with lft | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 22:58 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>>> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > JLT> but also the license (the "VOSTROM Public License") is strange > > JLT> and had never been officially checked for acceptability in > > JLT> Fedora. > > > > In case anyone wants to see the license, it't actually not on the > > upstream website but I've extracted it from the tarball: > > http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/vostrom-license.txt > > What do you think is strange about this license? Looks permissive to me. Clauses 5 and 7 are problematic. It's been at the FSF for a while now, they're backlogged from us and IcedTea. ~spot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
