Re: Jpackage: follow or lead?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Jerry James wrote:
On 8/21/07, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:asm2 is already in Fedora. It's just never been built. It's owner is Permaine Cheung (pcheung).Thanks for the information. I will contact Permaine.
Hi, Do you know how backwards-compatible is this Asm 3.x version?In any case, I think we should go with a asm3 one. This end up being used by some software that require certification and changing the version used is always troublesome for their developers.
I can get asm3 into JPackage 5.0, perhaps into the devel area and could even import it and build.
But I suspect, even being a versioned package of asm, one would still have to propose it using the usual proceedure.
regards, Fernando -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]