Re: GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora! | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Harald Hoyer wrote: > Harald Hoyer schrieb: >> Colin Walters schrieb: >>> However, I was fairly sure there had to already be something open >>> source out there to use as a start. My initial googling wasn't too >>> successful (a lot of things called licenses), but then I had the >>> bright idea to add "Debian" to my search. Turns out there's a >>> license analyzing script in >> ... >> s.th. like the attached perl script might be a start.. >> is there a public fedora cvs where I can check that in, so that it can >> be extended? >> btw, I'm not perl guru, don't expect nice code.. > > ok, with the attached perl script, I quickly spotted for my packages: This is _most_ useful, especially for a package like bsd-games with 421 source files to examine[1]. Many thanks for posting this. --Wart [1]Found Licenses: BSD (no advertise clause), BSD (with advertise clause, not GPL conform) -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
[Home] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
